Walking through downtown Manhattan any given day, you encounter a cultural oddity. The Paul Bunyan statue from Fargo has come to life, reproduced, and taken over entire neighborhoods. Filson, Red Wing, Woolrich, Engineered Garments. Some have called these come-to-life city-dwelling folk heroes, “urban woodsmen.” But Elliott James Sainsbury of Menswear has coined a better term to describe the Bunyanites, and that is “monocle man.” ESJ writes, “He shops at Borough Market and Columbia Road. He listens to Radio 4. He might grow his own veg or at least get a vegebox, drink wanky coffee and listen to Mumford & Sons (whose name actually sound like a countryfied clothing label). And, of course, he reads ever-so-slightly po faced magazines like Inventory, A Continuous Lean. and, of course, MONOCLE.” ESJ is describing an English type with an American analogue in the woodsman. He’s the man for our times. A consummate consumer caught in an economic downturn, he purchases common-looking items that cost oodles of money. He is the ironically conspicuous inconspicuous consumer. That madras shirt can’t cost $125. Oh, but it does.
Almost as interesting as the Monocle Man phenomenon itself is the reaction to the phenomenon. For a group that subscribes to an incredibly narrow interpretation of classic American style manufactured by specific brands which have received the imprimatur of the chief woodsman, Monocle Men are surprisingly fearful of labels, especially ones that draw attention to the extent of their preening. Blogs that announced the arrival of Monocle Man were met with defensive comments from woodsmen hailing from Williamsburg all the way to Chelsea. “I can wear Filson because my third cousin used to shoot skeet…or was it trap? Wait, which is the blue-collar one?” Authenticity is the Monocle Man’s bugaboo. If he can prove that his interest in American clothing is not ephemeral, not just a manifestation of the vicissitudes of the fashion cycle, he can attain at least some pretense of authenticity. Ironically, for a style that would have a young graphic designer walking around the Meatpacking District dressed like Ed Gein, phoniness is really looked down upon.
Of course, Monocle Men attach too much importance to authenticity. It’s sincerity that counts, isn’t it? Wear what you like because you like it and save everyone the rationalizations.
ha! bravo!
Huzzah!
Hey, I like Mumford and Sons…
I’ve also never spent more than $50 for a shirt, but that’s more out of poverty than ideology…
Help me Monocle Man!
Finally, somebody said it.
Everything says “Union” some where in the label or description, but no union workers ever going to spend $100 on that foreign made selvedge chambray shirt.
They cringe at the thought of guns let alone actually hunting – but the clothes sure look nifty!
“…. a young graphic designer walking around the Meatpacking Disctrict dressed like Ed Gein….”
That’s freakin’ brilliant. I concluded that one of the Orvis offerings last fall had a “Gein-esque” look to it and Orvis is hardly driving the charge out the ass for working man’s clothes strategy but hey…if someone’s buyin’…..
Not a fan of this type or the Monocle Man blogs, which to me seem like continuous advertisements for some product or other. Very…girly.
They do like authentic American clothing–that is, after it has been ripped off and copied and marketed by some Wesleyan grad and his too-cool-for-school college buddies living in deepest Brooklyn.
They like to grow beards and wear Filson plaid shirts because they think it makes them look masculine, i.e. helps them get chicks.
We’re not consumers–we’re men!
Thanks for all the comments. It’s nice to see the authors of some of my favorite blogs stop in here.
LBT, you’re dead-on with the product placement on those blogs. Even worse when they start offering their own wares.
ADG, I’m waiting for someone to bring LL Bean’s “Total Illusion 3D Camo Suit” into the mainstream.
The article is brillant but the conclusion is the most important.
I react negatively to the term “Monocle Man” because it implies an income that I don’t have. I can’t drop $170 on a pair of swimming trunks (sold in Monocle’s shop). I don’t react as strongly against “Urban lumberjack” or other labels that don’t imply buying things at Monocle prices. You can still dress like this on thrift shop budgets.
Ever wonder if the lumberjacks are out cutting down tress in Gucci suits?
I’ve hunted waterfowl, chopped wood with an axe, raised a sail and drunk homemade booze out of a plastic milk jug. But never in the city… . And the beard would get in the way of a good cheek weld.
Gentleman,
There is nothing new under the sun:
http://tinyurl.com/ye9luk8
http://seventhavenuegangster.tumblr.com/post/476857998/is-the-monocle-man-the-new-sloan
Schorsch,
If all those guys were Bob Dylan, I’d cut them some slacke…but they ain’t.